Formulation and Delivery - Biomolecular
Shrey A. Shah, MS
PhD Student
University of Maryland
Hyattsville, Maryland, United States
Shrey A. Shah, MS
PhD Student
University of Maryland
Hyattsville, Maryland, United States
Robert Smitty Oakes, Ph.D.
Post-doc
University of Maryland
College Park, Maryland, United States
Christopher Jewell, Ph.D.
Professor
University of Maryland
College Park, Maryland, United States
Figure 1. MNs delivering specific regulatory cues along with self-antigen lead to improved efficacy in pre-clinical models of MS. MNs offer an ability to be loaded with different immune cues, A) MOG + Immune cue 1, and B) MOG + Immune cue 2. C) Il-10 production (pg/ml) by moDCs after treatment with these immune cues, measured using ELISA. * represents p<0.05. Statistics were carried out using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-correction for multiple comparisons. D) IVIS images of draining LNs 3 days after treatment with MNs loaded with fluorescently labeled antigen and immune cues, with or without clodronate (clod) depletion (N=5 per group). Mean clinical scores of mice after treatment with MNs loaded with E) MOG + Immune cue 1 and F) MOG + Immune cue 2. Increasing scores indicate an increased level of paralysis. Arrows indicate treatment timepoints. Scores were assigned using a standard scale: 0-asymptomatic, 1-flaccid tail, 2-hind limp paresis/partial paralysis, 3-total hind limb paralysis, and 4-hind and front limb paralysis. * represents p<0.05. Statistics were carried out using multiple t-tests at each time point for the clinical scores.