Formulation and Delivery - Chemical
Xiaolin Xu, BS
Graduate Student
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Xiaolin Xu, BS
Graduate Student
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Jesse Yu, Ph.D.
Senior Scientist
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Rodney J. Ho, Ph.D.
Professor
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Qingxin Mu, Ph.D.
Acting assistant professor
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Figure 1. Time-course of GT-in-DcNP to sustain tumor gemcitabine levels as determined by tumor-to-plasma gemcitabine ratio. GT-in-DcNP administered subcutaneously resulted in a consistent tumor-to-plasma concentration ratios of gemcitabine above for 48-hour in both sub-illiac and axillary 4T1 tumor implanted in fat-pads.
Figure 2. Dose proportional effects of gemcitabine and paclitaxel in DcNP or free form on orthotopic 4T1 tumor inhibition. Mice with 4T1 tumors in fat-pads were treated with GT in free form at 20:2 mg/kg (∆) or GT-in-DcNP at 5:0.5 mg/kg (◊), 10:1 mg/kg (□) or 20:2 mg/kg (○) 24 hours after cancer cell inoculation. Mice were monitored for 168 h (7 days) after cell inoculation and before termination, and tumor growth was evaluated by luminescence. Panel A and B represent the luminescence signal integrations from axillary tumors and sub-iliac tumors, respectively. The mean and standard deviation of luminescence are presented (n=8-10). DcNP vs Free, *p < 0.005, ** p<0.01, ***p < 0.005, Student’s T-test.